Sunday, December 02, 2007
Where is the Feminist Outrage?
Deneen Borelli
wants to know: Where is the feminist outrage over jailing of British woman in Sudan?
Says Deneen:
"I'm amazed by the silence of the so-called women's rights groups like NOW. This is an example of their selective feminist outrage. When it fits their liberal agenda and bias, they are extremely vocal. When it doesn't, their silence is deafening."
My personal theory is the feminist leaders don't identify much with elementary school teachers. Teaching young children is a female-dominated profession, and feminist leaders tend not to think highly of those professions.
They are a little bit sexist that way.
_____
Labels: Culture, Foreign Policy, Liberals, Project 21, Social Issues
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 1:15 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Black Activists Criticize Local NAACP, School Officials for Censoring Ohio School Play
Project 21 members believe the NAACP's criticism of Lakota East High School for producing the play "Ten Little Indians" is more than a little
misguided:
Black Activists Criticize Local NAACP, School Officials for Censoring Ohio School Play
The Lakota East High School dramatic production of the Agatha Christie novel Ten Little Indians -- initially cancelled by school administrators after it was called racially insensitive by a local NAACP leader -- is back on, but with changes that imply the play will be compromised by political correctness.
Members of the Project 21 black leadership network call the actions of Butler County NAACP president Gary Hines inappropriate and detrimental to race relations. They say it presents the appearance of a shakedown of the southwestern Ohio school system. They are also critical of school officials for buckling under pressure from Hines.
"In this era of unprecedented equality, and particularly when it affects impressionable and innocent young people, Gary Hines is stirring the pot of racial animosity with a pretty big spoon," said Project 21 fellow Deneen Borelli. "It appears he whipped up a controversy that may generate business for him. Some people would call that a shakedown."
East Lakota students worked for months to produce the play "Ten Little Indians," which the Educational Theatre Association says is one of the top 25 plays produced by high schools nationwide. Based on the Agatha Christie novel of the same name, it is a murder mystery about a killer stalking a group of strangers trapped on an island. The killer knocks over Indian figurines after a murder is committed.
When it was first published in England in 1939, the title used the "n-word" instead of Indian, and the original English book cover had black figures on it. The American version, first published in 1940, as always used the term “Indian.” The stage version is sometimes titled "And Then There Were None."
Hines -- the owner of the GPH Consultants diversity training company and a reported long-time critic of the Lakota Local Schools system -- implied he was going to lead a protest of the play, which was supposed to be performed this weekend. He told the Cincinnati Enquirer the play is about "genocide" and that "kids don't have enough information about diversity." Referring to the original name and artwork of the novel published overseas over 70 years ago, he told the Cincinnati Post, "We can't run away from that." He said, however, he would not oppose the play being done by a community or professional theater group.
Lakota Board of Education president Joan Powell, referring to Hines' past criticism of the school system, told the Enquirer she believed Hines' financial goals may influence his actions.
Superintendent Mike Taylor today said the play will be performed next month, but with changes. It will be performed under its alternative title, contain unspecified additional material and will feature what the Associated Press describes as "conversations and other activities" that Taylor said will "honor diversity in the community."
Also unspecified is any participation by Hines -- paid or unpaid -- in the school's new diversity-related programming.
"To claim that harm will be caused by students re-creating a 1939 Agatha Christie novel, via a theatre production, is the height of political correctness run amuck," said Project 21 member Joe Hicks. "The trajectory of this nation's racial and ethnic relations has produced a radically altered ethnic and racial landscape. Today, America is the most tolerant industrial society in the world. The assumption that some imaginary hoops have to be jumped through to avoid hurting the feelings of some ultra-sensitive individuals with defined political agendas is simply incorrect."
Project 21 chairman Mychal Massie added: "This ridiculous capitulation further compromises what was already a grotesque abrogation of the students’ creative environment. The Lakota Local Schools is attempting to straddle the fence of racial intimidation. Those innocent school children have the right to their creative enterprise without being subjected to race mongers who are intent on inculcating their condemnable agendas. Instead of coming down on the side of common sense, the school district signaled their willingness to support this person's malevolence."
_____
Labels: Culture, Education, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 10:54 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Saturday, October 20, 2007
BET Rewards the Jena Six
Unbelievable.
The one positive note is that some of BET's viewers apparently are outraged.
Hat tip: Bizzy Blog and Green Mountain Politics._____
Labels: Culture
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 9:29 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Saturday, October 06, 2007
I Saw Your Nanny
An entire blog exists for people to
report bad nannies.
Happily, some of the stories there are about good nannies, but if you employ a nanny, you might want to read this blog once in a while.
_____
Labels: Culture
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 12:20 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Saturday, September 29, 2007
What's Wrong With the Term "Trekkie," Anyway?
National Review Online is running a delightful Star Trek feature this weeked. No conservative Star Trek fan should miss it.
But I do wonder how James Lileks can
not know the correct title of the ST:TOS episode guest-starring Joan Collins is "The City on the Edge of Forever."
_____
Labels: Culture, Media
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 3:02 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, September 28, 2007
Inviting Government into the Living Room
David Leonhardt, a male New York Times economics columnist, sees men on the sofa while women are working, and
concludes the answer is universal preschool and federally-mandated paid leave for new parents.
Leave it to the New York Times to try to federalize the problem of lazy spouses.
Is there
anything the Times won't try to federalize?
_____
Labels: Culture, Liberals, Media
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 3:30 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, September 07, 2007
Being PC More Important Than Welfare of Children
This
pathetic story shows what happens when people -- in this case, local government employees in Britain -- place a higher priority on being politically correct than being morally right.
I hope the people who put their fear of being thought politically-incorrect
over the welfare of children are, at the very least, fired, though in a big-government strong-public union country like modern Britain, I suppose it is unlikely. Governments everywhere take care of themselves first, and never more so than when public employees are permitted to unionize.
_____
Labels: Culture, Labor Unions, Political Correctness
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 12:27 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, August 24, 2007
For Michael Vick and Hip-Hop Culture, No Sympathy from Kevin Martin
Michael Vick and hip-hop culture are the focus of these thoughts by Project 21's Kevin Martin: Hip-Hop Hype Hurts, Just Ask Michael Vick
Hip-hop culture has claimed a high-profile victim: Michael Vick.
I refuse to have an ounce of sympathy for Michael Vick, who is reaching a plea agreement with federal prosecutors for his role in arranging dog fights on his Virginia property and allegedly killing several of the dogs himself when they did not live up to expectations.
It is mind-boggling to imagine what was going through Vick's mind when he first decided engage in dogfighting. This admired black NFL quarterback was pretty much set for life with the Atlanta Falcons - making millions of dollars a year on the field and off with his many retail endorsements.
Vick apparently could not break with the hip-hop lifestyle he embraced, and now he will more than likely end up in financial ruin, suspended or even banned from the NFL for life and going to jail because of what may have been his insane need to have street cred among hip-hoppers.
Dogfighting is a major component of hip-hop culture. It can be seen in videos and lyrics of hip-hop giants such as Jay-Z and DMX. According to an article recently posted on MTV's web site, "hip-hop is one of the only outlets in American where you'll find references to [dogfighting]."
I see many young black men dragged through the streets of Washington
DC by their angry-looking pit bulls. I suspect those dogs, from the looks of them, are the victims of repeated beatings and maybe even fed gunpowder to make them even more vicious. I expect they are being conditioned to fight.
These animals become so dangerous that, when they are abandoned for being either too old or no longer wanted, local animal control officials often euthanize them quickly because they are unable to control them.
There are those who will defend Vick or demonize his prosecutors for his already-admitted indiscretions. NBA star Stephon Marbury called dogfighting a sport and compared it to deer hunting - an activity that is highly-regulated by the government and not a vehicle for organized gambling. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference - the group founded by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. - came dangerously close to turning its 50th anniversary celebration into a pro-Vick rally. Even the NAACP got dragged into it when Atlanta chapter president R.L. White said the NFL should show Vick mercy no matter what Vick's plea and punishment are.
I expect charges of racism will soon follow.
How many more Michael Vicks, Mike Tysons and Adam "Pacman" Joneses will it take before the black community wakes up and demands these athletes and others who embrace the hip-hop culture take personal accountability for their own actions? Vick and the others are suffering because of their own actions. Racism has nothing to do with it at all.
League commissioners, owners and fans, to their credit, seem no longer to be willing to play along with these bad-boy attitudes. People are not going to pay good money to see R-rated sporting events. The NBA found this out the hard way several years ago when people started calling it "thugball" and fan attendance started dropping off after players began physically assaulting fans and coaches.
In the end, I expect Vick will have learned a very valuable lesson - that his boys were not going to take the fall for him as they all turned state's evidence against him, forcing him to cut a deal. I guess the no-snitch rule among hip-hoppers went out the window. There truly is no honor among thieves.
It is here that we see the downside of the hip-hop culture. The ruined lives. Incarceration. It's not glamorous.
Vick's future now seems to include a fitting for a pumpkin-colored suit, soap on a rope and learning to sleep on his back. The only football he will be throwing around will likely be in the prison yard because, at the end of the day, he was just plain stuck on stupid and lost it all because he craved an image.
_____
Labels: Culture, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 5:04 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, August 17, 2007
A Message for the Lady Who is Suing Don Imus
Project 21's Dutch Martin
has a few words for the young lady who is suing Don Imus:
As a race, blacks endured hundreds of years of slavery and then legalized segregation, brutal racism and other forms of discrimination well into the 20th century. We emerged from this hardship a stronger and better people. Now, after all that we've been through, a few unkind words from one largely irrelevant white man is causing so many of us to fall to pieces and this one person in particular to be so devastated that she has to sue for damages? This is the kind of knee-jerk victim mentality that makes us, now more than four decades past the civil rights era, look pathetic.
This shows that too many people are still fixated on race, and I'm looking beyond Don Imus. If Ms. Vaughn and other aggrieved black women really wanted to strike a blow against the use of words like 'ho,' 'bitch' and 'trick,' they would be suing Snoop Dogg, Jay-Z and other thug rappers and the record companies that have been proliferating and profiting off this kind of language for years. Don Imus was merely doing a poor job of parroting their words.
_____
Labels: Culture, Media, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 1:58 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
There's a Difference Between Racism and Ignorance, Says Project 21 Chairman
A white person wary of black teens in baggy jeans is not necessarily a racist, says Project 21 Chairman Mychal Massie in an article about continuing racism faced by blacks, especially black males, in New York state's
Journal News by Dwight R. Worley (excerpted):
Bevolyn Williams-Harold watched her son sing and dance as he took part in a radio station promotion at The Westchester shopping mall in White Plains. She chatted briefly with the other mothers as their children played musical chairs and other games.
As the event continued, two black teenage boys dressed in baggy jeans walked through the food court laughing loudly. "The parents who were chattering just stopped talking and stared at these two young men," Williams-Harold said of that moment in October. "You kind of felt the tension."
The same white women who talked with her, seemingly oblivious to her dark skin, froze at the mere sight of the black boys.
She thought of her 7-year-old son, Jourdan, a first-grader at George Washington Elementary in White Plains, and wondered how long it would be before they cringed at the sight of him. She also considers the avalanche of obstacles he would face throughout his life as such negative perceptions provoked unfounded fears.
"Black men have a hard time in this country. It's a difficult road to walk," said Williams-Harold, a 40-year-old freelance writer who lives in White Plains. "I want people to understand how difficult it is to raise a black child and the added difficulty with a black male child."
Williams-Harold embodies an attitude common among many black men and women. While the notion of overt racism and discrimination seems outdated given advances in civil rights and changes in social attitudes, many blacks say there is still evidence of racism in their everyday lives...
...But the progressive attitudes most people believe they have seem to disappear when it comes to close encounters with black men, said Ernest Prince of Katonah.
Prince said he is often followed around stores by security staff and clerks when he shops, whether he's wearing sweats or a three-piece suit.
Such tales are a frequent complaint of young black men, whom merchants say often come into stores in groups and look suspicious. But Prince is 64 and president of the Urban League of Westchester County.
"They just automatically assumed black man - criminal," Prince said. "They don't see me, they just see black."
But that rush to judgment can cut both ways, and often does when blacks demonize whites, said Mychal Massie, the outspoken chairman of Project 21, a black conservative think tank in Washington.
Massie cited the controversy surrounding the rape case at Duke University, in which a group of white athletes were accused of raping a black exotic dancer. Serious doubts about the truthfulness of the woman's account have since been raised, but not before the men involved were tarnished with charges of racism, Massie said.
"There's a difference between racism and ignorance," he said. "Just because ... a person is put off by the sloppy gangster-style dress that we see so many of our young people, especially young black people, wearing, it does not make them racist. I don't believe that white people get up in the morning thinking about what they can do to oppress black people or hold black people down."
But as with the reactions by the women in the mall, Williams-Harold said, racism can be conscious or subconscious, and she believes it is more pervasive than many would like to admit...
...But Massie maintains that concerns about racism are often overblown, and suggests individual behavior and performance are key...
Read it all
here.
Labels: Culture, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 10:07 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Monday, June 18, 2007
Black Conservatives Mark "Juneteenth" Civil Rights Holiday
Project 21 is
commemorating Juneteenth:
Black Conservatives Mark "Juneteenth" Civil Rights Holiday
Members of the Project 21 black leadership network are asking that the oldest and most recognized commemoration of the end of slavery in the United States - "Juneteenth," observed on June 19 - be used as a day for reflection on the struggle for freedom and the ongoing quest for self-empowerment.
Project 21 members urge black Americans to use this day to embrace their inherent talents and strengthen their ties with family and community for the betterment of themselves and future generations.
"The abolishment of slavery paved the way for blacks to empower themselves and opened the doors for freedom and opportunities," said Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli. "Juneteenth celebrations are a reminder to all that freedom is never free."
Juneteenth commemorates the anniversary of the arrival of Union soldiers in Galveston, Texas on June 19, 1865. The soldiers carried with them the news that the Civil War was over and that slavery was abolished through President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation two-and-a-half years earlier.
The annual commemoration of this date, which became known as Juneteenth, quickly became a stabilizing as well as a motivating presence in the lives of the African-Americans who lived in Texas and faced the many uncertainties associated with their newly acquired freedom. The observance quickly spread from Texas to become recognized in black communities across the United States.
Juneteenth is celebrated in diverse ways, but over the years, education and self-improvement have been consistent themes at commemorative community gatherings and picnics. In 1980, Juneteenth was made an official holiday in Texas. According to the National Juneteenth Holiday Campaign, 25 states currently recognize Juneteenth as a state holiday and it has been recognized by President George W. Bush in special presidential messages.
Project 21 member Murdock "Doc" Gibbs, a Texas resident, said: "June 19, 1865 was a turning point for the black people of Texas. It was a recognition of the equality between them and their former white masters. We must continue as a people to shake off the modern slave masters that threaten our families, our communities and our future - the slave masters of drugs, illegitimacy, family breakdown, poor education and crime. We can use this important holiday to remind us that we are the masters of our own destiny and hold the keys to our own survival through the choices we make."
_____
Labels: Culture, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 1:25 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, June 08, 2007
NAACP Downsizing Because It's a Dinosaur
Project 21 Chairman Mychal Massie is scoffing at the NAACP's explanation for its financial woes,
reports Randy Hall at CNSNews.com:
Massie laid much of the blame for the NAACP's financial problems on Julian Bond, director of the organization's board of directors. Bond, he said, 'can find no good thing in society today and still asserts that America is living in the Jim Crow past when nothing could be further from the truth.''At the same time, they're not addressing the very real ills in the black community: out-of-control abortion, which amounts to nothing more than black genocide; out-of-control single-parent households; out-of-control black-on-black crime; and out-of-control disrespectful, misogynistic behavior directed toward women in rap music,' Massie said.'Instead, they are stuck in the antediluvian mantra of days past where 'white people are out to get us.' And that is wearing thin,' he said.
Mychal also told CNSNews.com that the NAACP is "a dinosaur."
____
Labels: Culture, Liberals, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 2:02 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Monday, June 04, 2007
Parents Lose Legal Custody of Home-Schooled Children
The Massachusetts Department of Social Services took legal custody of two children, not because of any allegation of abuse or neglect, but because their parents were deemed "unfit" relating to home-schooling their children.Parents Lose Legal Custody of Home-Schooled ChildrenTo the consternation of officials from the Waltham Public Schools and the Massachusetts town's Department of Social Services (DSS), Kim and George Bryant decided to home-school their son, Nick, and daughter, Nyssa.
This decision ignited a legal fight between the local government and the Bryants that lasted over six years and became so contentious that the DSS took legal custody of the children.
The DSS was awarded legal custody of the Bryant children after the school district obtained a court ruling in 2001 stating the Bryants were "unfit" parents because they didn't file an educational plan or grading system meeting school district approval. The Bryants countered that their plan was very similar to one accepted for a familyin Framingham, another eastern Massachusetts school district.
Nonetheless, Kim and George were determined to be in "educational neglect" of their children, and the DSS was awarded legal custody of Nick and Nyssa. The children, however, continued to live with their parents and Bryants continued to provide and pay for all of the children's expenses. At no point did the DSS offer or provide any services. George Bryant explained, "DSS did virtually nothing to support the 'health' of my family," while claiming legal custody of the children. Both sides additionally agree the children were never abused mentally, physically, sexually or emotionally by their parents.
On June 12, 2003, DSS officials and four police officers arrived at the Bryant home at 7:45 am and ordered the children be taken to a hotel, where they would be given a standardized test. DSS worker Susan Etscovitz charged: "We have legal custody of the children and will do with them what we see fit... They are minors and they do what we tell them to do."
After the DSS failed to convince Nick and Nyssa to go to the hotel to sit for the test, the Framingham Juvenile Court issued a same-day ruling ordering their parents to take them. At the hotel, the children continued to refuse to take the test. Nyssa said, "We don't want to take the test. We have taken them before, and I don't think that they are a fair assessment of what we know." George Bryant echoed his daughter's complaint, saying, "Private school students do not take standardized tests. Why should our children be subjected to this, against their will?" He added: "We do not believe in assessing our children based on a number or letter. Their education process is their personal intellectual property." Surprisingly, Waltham School Superintendent Susan Parrella provided support to the Bryants' cause when she weighed in on the matter in quote to a local newspaper: "An acceptable home school plan is in place right now. I was not aware of any testing occurring today."
Nonetheless, a court hearing to determine whether a complete transfer of custody of the Bryant children to the DDS would take place due to their noncompliance was scheduled for the next day. But the hearing was later postponed indefinitely. George Bryant commented, "We were told [Thursday] that we must show up [Friday]. Several hours later we received a note in our door from DSS saying that it will be discussed at a later time." Since the issue was left unresolved, the Bryants were burdened for some time by the possibility that DSS officials and police officers would arrive at their door to demand their compliance with school district regulations, or perhaps to take the children to foster homes.
The Bryant case may be an extreme example, but home-schooling families in the Bay State often face hostile local governments. Scott Somerville, a staff attorney for the Home School Legal Defense Association, notes "Massachusetts is a barbaric [state] for homeschoolers."
While Nick continued to be home-schooled, Nyssa chose to enroll in a public high school in the neighboring Belmont Public School District in the fall of 2003. To facilitate her placement, Kim compiled a transcript highlighting the work Nyssa completed during her home schooling. As a result of her past educational achievement, Nyssa began high school a grade above most students in her age group. She made the school's highest honor roll every semester.
Sources: Townhall.com (June 18, 2003), WorldNetDaily (June 2003 coverage), PrisonPlanet.com, Talon News (June 17, 2003), GOPUSA News (June 17, 2003), Childrenfirstamerica.org, Penwing.com, Home School Legal Defense Association, Kim Bryant, George Greeley Bryant**Read this story and 99 other all-new outrageous stories of government regulatory abuse in the new fifth edition of the National Center for Public Policy Research's book,
Shattered Dreams: One Hundred Stories of Government Abuse. Download your free PDF copy today
here or purchase a print copy online
here.**
_____
Labels: Culture, Education, Regulation, Regulatory Victims, Social Issues
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 12:16 AM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, June 01, 2007
Home Schoolers Banned in Calvert County
Calvert County, MD bans the use of a county building by home-schooled students on the grounds that such instruction, though open to the public, would duplicate county services and waste taxpayer dollars.Activities Banned From Community Center: Alcohol, Crime... and Home Schooling?You can take a foreign language class at community centers in Calvert County, Maryland. You can play ultra-violent fantasy wargames, possibly even ones based on pagan beliefs. You can even participate in Bible study classes. But Lydia Goulart and Kyle Travers have found out the hard way that you can't teach a class in fiber arts or host a geography club there if your lessons happen to be in conjunction with home schooling.
In Calvert County, using a county building to "home school" children ranks among prohibited activities like alcohol use, criminal acts or hosting for-profit events. According to county officials, allowing home schooling parents to use public facilities for their classes and extracurricular activities would be a waste of taxpayer money because it would create "duplicate services" already provided by the public schools. This decision stands despite the fact that Goulart and Travers planned on opening their activities to the public and sought to utilize rooms that otherwise were empty.
The Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, arguing Calvert County officials violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the law. The court ruled against Goulart and Travers, allowing the ban on homeschooling activities to continue. HSLDA appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. On September 26, 2003, the Fourth Circuit Appeals Court overturned the District Court, affirming that teaching the young is protected under the First Amendment. However, the court also held that the Community Center had not violated the rights of the homeschoolers by excluding them from the facilities. HSLDA decided not to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sources: The Home School Legal Defense Association, The Daily Record (Baltimore, Maryland) (September 29, 2003)**Read this story and 99 other all-new outrageous stories of government regulatory abuse in the new fifth edition of the National Center for Public Policy Research's book,
Shattered Dreams: One Hundred Stories of Government Abuse. Download your free PDF copy today
here or purchase a print copy online
here.**
_____
Labels: Culture, Education, Regulation, Regulatory Victims, Social Issues
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 4:26 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
On the Eighteenth of April, in Seventy-Five
In honor of our forefathers, and an anniversary worth remembering, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's
Paul Revere's Ride.
If you haven't read it lately, take a moment to read it again. It's worth recalling that the very birth of this nation was a close-run thing. We have much to be thankful for.
_____
Labels: Culture, Defense, History
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 12:12 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Friday, April 13, 2007
Eugene Robinson: White People Can't Talk
In the Washington Post today, in-house columnist Eugene Robinson diminishes everything the true civil rights leaders fought for.
Eugene Robinson: "Why Imus Had to Go": ...For young black hip-hop artists to use such language [as "nappy-headed hos"] to demean black women is similarly deplorable -- and, I would argue, even more damaging. But come on, people, don't deceive yourselves that it's precisely the same thing. Don't pretend that 388 years of history -- since the first shackled African slaves arrived at Jamestown -- never happened. The First Amendment notwithstanding, it has always been the case that some speech has been off-limits to some people. I remember a time when black people couldn't say "I'd like to vote, please." Now, white people can't say "nappy-headed hos." You'll survive...
For Martin Luther King, Jr., it was about equality. For Eugene Robinson, it's about retribution. (Witness Robinson's evident satisfaction that there's something -- he believes -- white people are not permitted to do.)
Contrast Robinson's "blacks get to say awful things about blacks but white people can't" philosophy with
Martin Luther King preaching about the importance of the content of character.
Imagine if Martin Luther King's earth-moving
1963 speech had instead have had a theme of, a la Eugene Robinson, "you've been mean to us for centuries; now we're going to be mean to you for a while."
It's hard to believe the civil rights movement would have uplifted the nation with that call to keep our civil ethics in the gutter, isn't it?
People of character do not call young ladies "whores." Even black people of character. Even people who spell and pronounce it properly.
Robinson furthermore mixes his issues in ways that betray the sloppiness of his reasoning process. Black people could always say "I'd like to vote, please." The fact that black men couldn't vote until
137 years ago was not about free speech, but suffrage. Likewise, the fact that landless white men
couldn't vote in America until 200-151 years ago (depending on state of residence), or black or white women until a mere 87 years ago.
It's worth noting, too, that Don Imus was penalized because his employer chose to penalize him. How many white people have high-profile broadcasting positions? How many black broadcasters today believe saying "nappy-headed hos" on the air would strengthen their negotiating position at contract time? Not very many, I bet.
Yet black and -- sorry, Mr. Robinson -- white people all over America have been saying "nappy-headed hos" by the thousands for a week now, yet there are no reports of anyone other than Don Imus being fired for it.
The true issue here is civility. We all ought to be civil to one another, we all were endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, and we all ought to realize -- as Eugene Robinson apparently does not -- that one bad turn does not deserve another.
Addendum: I read a few other Eugene Robinson columns while having lunch.
Commenting on the story that Strom Thurmond's first cousin twice removed "owned" Al Sharpton's great-grandfather,
Robinson writes: "Sharpton learned for the first time that his name came from Alexander Sharpton, a rich Edgefield County slave owner. Nothing unusual there -- that's the way we got our surnames, from our ancestors' owners..."
Who is "we"? It sounds like he means Sharpton, himself, and his readers. Does he write his column thinking only of readers who are descended from American slaves? (Never mind that a substantial part of the population, including the descendants of slaves, got their surname from their husbands.)In a column on President Bush, Robinson
strikes a blow against dividing people into simple categories: "A president who reduces the near-infinite variety of humankind to 'with us' or 'against us' has mired the nation..."
The near-infinite variety of humankind came down to just two groups when you wrote that blacks can say "nappy-headed hos" and whites can't, Mr. Robinson. "With us" or "against us," indeed.And
on global warming: "The first half of January 2007 was so balmy in the Northeast that crocuses bloomed."
And the middle of April is so cold they may cancel the Boston Marathon. The point?_____
Labels: Culture, Media
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 1:20 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Thoughts on a Don Imus Wannabee
Taking cues from Don Imus,
Pat Oliphant,
Jeff Danziger and the New York Times syndicate,
Ted Rall,
the Palestinian press,
Julian Bond,
Bellevue Community College in Seattle, the
Universal Press Syndicate,
someone at USA Today's website, Ann "Money-Maker" Coulter, radio host
John "Sly" Sylvester and the Mid-West Broadcast Group, and especially
Garry Trudeau (among others), leftie blogger
TBogg decided the other day to call our Secretary of State "Brown Sugar."
I wonder if the thought of a successful black woman genuinely makes Mr. TBogg think of people who sleep their way to the top. It is equally likely that this was a ploy for attention. Or, perhaps, TBogg just says nasty things, but is not particularly original.
I asked Project 21 Chairman Mychal Massie and Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli what they think of it.
Mychal Massie: "These comments meant to be insulting, calcify that which we have long known -- for liberals, it isn't what you say that matters, it's who you say it about. Imus's sin was clearly who he chose to comment about -- had he directed his insults at Dr. Rice or Justice Thomas not only would there have been no penalty or outcry from the cacophony of race-mongers we now hear, but we would be the only ones talking about it."
Deneen Borelli: "This Don Imus impersonator is ignorant of the fact that Dr. Condoleezza Rice is a successful black female, currently the Secretary of State, former National Security Advisor, former Stanford University Provost, has several honorary doctorates, served on numerous boards, is a concert pianist and is fluent in several languages. Cheap insults will never diminish her accomplishments."
I agree with both.
It does seem that, for many on the left, it's not what you say, but who you say it about. (It's also who says it. Rush Limbaugh can't even
say the media wishes a black quarterback well, while rap singers and their corporate backers can say and promote atrocious filth.)
But Deneen is right, also. It's ludicrious for Trudeau and TBogg and others to imply that Condoleezza Rice owes her influence not to accomplishments, but to her alleged personal relationship with a man. They make fools of themselves.
Others blogging this include:
Gay Patriot
The Mahablog
Riehl World View
Blog-o-Fascists
186k Per Second
The Wiccan Warrior
Neptunus Lex
lgf
Gateway Pundit
Confederate Yankee
Villainous Company
captaincox.com
Right Wing News
_____
Labels: Culture, Liberals, Project 21
Posted by Amy Ridenour at 10:53 PM
Email this
Social bookmark this
Copyright 2003-2008 National Center for Public Policy Research